Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a score of 80.9, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a more recent 12 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, so it provides lots of additional features. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra construction is noticeably newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than the Google Pixel 3a XL.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more processing cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos, a lot higher 200 MP resolution back camera and a way higher video definition.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.