Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's score of 78.9. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is extremely newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 3a XL.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot more MP camera and a much larger back camera sensor. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.