Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with an 81.9 score against 78.9. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but it is just a little heavier.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a just a little better count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.