Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's general score of 78.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it's somewhat heavier. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit bigger display. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.