Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, offering lots of additional features. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it's just a bit thicker and heavier.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 448 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 22 percent greater battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back facing camera with lot more MP, a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs, a larger diafragm aperture and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.