Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power, with a 78.9 score against 76.1. Although the Google Pixel 3a XL is older than Motorola Moto G Power, it's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Moto G Power's processing unit is very similar to Google Pixel 3a XL's processor, they have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Moto G Power features a display that's very similar to the Google Pixel 3a XL one, because although the Moto G Power has a little bit inferior pixel quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels. The Moto G Power features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Power also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Moto G Power counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Google Pixel 3a XL is a bit more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.