Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than Moto G8 Power's score of 76. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the newer 11 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10, so it gives you lots of additional features and improved performance. The Google Pixel 3a XL body is lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G8 Power, even though it was released just a bit over a year before.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in Google Pixel 3a XL, both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Moto G8 Power counts with a display that is very similar to the Google Pixel 3a XL one, because although the Moto G8 Power has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2300px resolution.
The Moto G8 Power has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G8 Power also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G8 Power has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power has better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35% more battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.