Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-07 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a way newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a XL has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Moto Z Force features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a larger number of cores.
Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a XL features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a camera with much more MP.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.