Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 general score. Motorola One Hyper's construction is heavier and a little thicker than the Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide the user identical operating system features.
The Google Pixel 3a XL and the Motorola One Hyper both count with extremely similar processing units, both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Motorola One Hyper and Google Pixel 3a XL both count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite larger screen.
The Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola One Hyper has a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.