Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having an 80.7 score against 78.9. Although Motorola One Vision is better than Google Pixel 3a XL, we must tell that it's also a just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier device. The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a little bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
Motorola One Vision counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM. Motorola One Vision features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Motorola One Vision captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger aperture, a lot higher resolution back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.