Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a global score of 80 against 78.9. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3a XL and the Motorola One Zoom feature similar CPUs, they have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Motorola One Zoom and Google Pixel 3a XL feature extremely similar displays, although the Motorola One Zoom also has a bit better pixel amount per inch of display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bigger screen. Motorola One Zoom features a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 128 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom captures better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger camera aperture, a back facing camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Motorola One Zoom features a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.