Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with an 87 score against 78.9. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is newer and a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number in each screen inch and a quite better 1080 x 2160 resolution. Motorola razr (2020) counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features improved battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 32 percent bigger battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.