Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| OLED | LTPO |
| 402 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's score of 78.9. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a way newer and notably thinner phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but it is also somewhat heavier. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a newer 15 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, so it counts with lots of additional features.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.