Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 overall score. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. The Nokia XR20 is a incredibly newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it is way thicker and noticeably heavier.
Nokia XR20 features just a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Nokia XR20 counts with just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Nokia XR20 has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Nokia XR20 has greater battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity. The Nokia XR20 features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.