Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 global score. Despite of the fact the Google Pixel 3a XL is older and a little thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's body is still a little bit lighter. These phones include Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a XL has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a bit larger screen, a little greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery size. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a back camera with much more MP, a larger aperture for better low-light images and video and a much bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.