Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a global score of 83.1 against 78.9. These phones include Android operating system, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. The OPPO Find X2 Pro design is newer than the Google Pixel 3a XL's, but it is heavier and just a little bit thicker.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better amount of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture, faster video frame rate, a lot more MP back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.