Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a 79.9 score against 78.9. The Galaxy A25 5G is a notably newer device than the Google Pixel 3a XL, although it's a little bit thicker and heavier. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a much better performing processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel count per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite larger screen.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.