Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than Google Pixel 3a XL's general score of 78.9. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it's heavier and just a bit thicker.
Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bit greater display pixel density, a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.