Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. Although the Google Pixel 3a XL and Galaxy A70 were only released 0 months apart, Google Pixel 3a XL's body is a little lighter but also a little bit thicker than Galaxy A70. These phones have Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a XL has newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A70 has a display that is very similar to the screen in Google Pixel 3a XL, because although the Galaxy A70 has a just a bit lower pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 3a XL also counts with a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 has better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 3a XL is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.