Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, getting an 88.1 score against 78.9. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide you the same OS features. Galaxy F62 is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy F62 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 89% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.