Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a global score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 overall score. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Even being the best device in this comparison review, the Galaxy M20 is an a bit thicker and heavier device than Google Pixel 3a XL.
The Google Pixel 3a XL and the Galaxy M20 have similar screens, although the Galaxy M20 also has a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each display inch, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite larger display. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy M20. They have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a larger aperture and a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.