Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with a global score of 89 against 78.9. Galaxy Note10's design weights the same than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but it's just a little bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with less MP, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 3a XL has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.