Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 score. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, giving you some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer than the Google Pixel 3a XL's, but it is just a little bit thicker and notably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little greater pixels density, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way better video resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos and a camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.