Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a 90.7 score against 78.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and extremely lighter phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, providing you a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bit better pixel quantity in each inch of display, a bit bigger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos, a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.