Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with an 80.1 score against 78.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, but it's extremely thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3a XL. They have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor, the Google Pixel 3a XL also counts with a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera and a lot higher (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3a XL, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.