Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is newer and thinner than Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it's a little bit heavier. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a quite bigger display, a little greater screen pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with less mega-pixels, they both have a F1.8 aperture and a 0.39 inches sensor. The Galaxy Z Flip has much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 12 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.