Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia PRO has a global score of 94.3, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL's global score of 78.9. The Sony Xperia PRO is a newer device than the Google Pixel 3a XL, although it's much thicker and notably heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Sony Xperia PRO has 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version.
Xperia PRO has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia PRO also has a larger amount of RAM. Sony Xperia PRO counts with a better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bit larger display, a much greater display density and a way better 1644 x 3840px resolution.
The Sony Xperia PRO counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xperia PRO counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much larger back camera sensor.
The Xperia PRO has a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xperia PRO is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xperia PRO, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.