Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blasting black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is better than Google Pixel 3a XL's general score of 78.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is newer than the Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it's extremely heavier and notably thicker.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a bit better display pixels density and a bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher video frame rate, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.