Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an overall score of 82.7, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 score. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version. Even being the best device we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro construction is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a bit bigger display, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.