Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, with a score of 83.8 against 78.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's construction has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it's heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL. They have a screen of the same size, the same pixels density and the same resolution of 1080 x 2160px. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and Google Pixel 3a XL feature very similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a lower video quality and a back-facing camera with a lower 12 MP resolution, they both have the same sensor size and a same size aperture.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 9 percent more battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.