Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a XL's overall score of 78.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an a little thicker and notably heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a bit greater screen pixel density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with a 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, a same size aperture and a same size sensor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has better video frame rates. The Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.