Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an overall score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 general score. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has 14 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's design is newer and noticeably thinner than Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it's extremely heavier.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a way larger screen, a way higher resolution of 2224 x 2488 and a just a little better display pixel density. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 38% greater battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a larger camera aperture, a back-facing camera with way more MP, a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.