Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having a global score of 80.6 against 78.9. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS. Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL, it's heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as Google Pixel 3a XL's one, they have equal internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.