Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-07 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, having a overall score of 78.9 against 76. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a a lot newer cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, but it's a little bit heavier and a little thicker. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2's processor is very similar to the Google Pixel 3a XL one, because although the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has 4 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px, a just a little greater count of pixels per screen inch and a quite bigger display.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4070mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a way less mega-pixels camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Google Pixel 3a XL is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.