Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-03-13 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, getting an 80.5 score against 78.9. Xiaomi Note 7 Pro's design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but it is heavier. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, giving lots of additional features.
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Note 7 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a little bigger display and a bit better pixel density.
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Note 7 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.