Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having a overall score of 87.9 against 78.9. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is newer than the Google Pixel 3a XL, it is a bit thicker and notably heavier. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a way better video quality and a lot bigger sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.