Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 global score. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS. The Google Pixel 3a XL is an older device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but Google managed to make it a bit lighter and just a bit thinner.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a little bit bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a back-facing camera with much more MP and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 3a XL is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.