Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a score of 86.1, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's global score of 78.9. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 3a XL. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a much higher resolution of 2080 x 2400, a little larger display and a little bit greater pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.