Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a 78.9 score against 77.1. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but it is lighter. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a way better resolution of 2080 x 2400, a little larger screen and a little more pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.