Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 has a score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's general score of 78.8. The iPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a counts with Android 11 OS. Even being the best device in this comparison, the iPhone 11 is an a little bit thicker and a lot heavier device than Google Pixel 3a.
The Google Pixel 3a and the iPhone 11 both feature extremely similar screens, because although the iPhone 11 has a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792 and much lesser pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Apple iPhone 11's memory to install applications and games is very similar to the Google Pixel 3a one, they have the same internal memory.
Apple iPhone 11 counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Apple iPhone 11 counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with less mega pixels, they both have the same back camera sensor size and a F1.8 camera aperture.
Apple iPhone 11 features just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 11, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.