Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a general score of 85.3, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a much heavier phone than Google Pixel 3a, but both of them are 0.32inches thick.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a better performing processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less processing cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processor. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little bit better display pixels density, a little bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a bigger screen.
Google Pixel 3a and Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max both have very similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. IPhone 11 Pro Max has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3969mAh battery size. The iPhone 11 Pro Max captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a less MP back camera and a worse video resolution, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor and a same size aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.