Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 has a general score of 91.5, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a's overall score of 78.8. IPhone 13 counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 OS. IPhone 13 is a much newer and just a bit thinner phone than Google Pixel 3a, but it is heavier. IPhone 13 features a better performing processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 2 less CPU cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 13 counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels, a little bigger display and a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch of screen. The iPhone 13 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
IPhone 13 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. IPhone 13 counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3227mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3a, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.