Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a's score of 78.8. IPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a comes with Android 11 OS. The iPhone 13 Pro construction is incredibly newer and just a little thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Google Pixel 3a.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better performance than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 13 Pro has a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little greater display pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture. The iPhone 13 Pro features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3095mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.