Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a comes with Android 11 OS. The iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is way newer and just a little thinner than the Google Pixel 3a's, although it is a lot heavier.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 2 less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and 2 GB more RAM memory. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a better 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a just a little higher number of pixels in each inch of display.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The iPhone 13 Pro Max captures a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.