Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 92.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3279mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 has an overall score of 92.5, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. Even though the Apple iPhone 14 is somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. Apple iPhone 14 has iOS 16.x operating system, and Google Pixel 3a counts with Android 11 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 14 has a better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a just a bit greater pixels number in each screen inch, a little bit larger display and a slightly better 1170 x 2532 resolution. IPhone 14 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
IPhone 14 features a more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a higher amount of RAM. Apple iPhone 14 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3279mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 14 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 14 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.