Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro has a global score of 95.6, which is way better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 general score. The iPhone 14 Pro construction is notably newer and a little thinner, but also way heavier than Google Pixel 3a. IPhone 14 Pro works with iOS 16.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 14 Pro features a superior processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and more RAM. The iPhone 14 Pro has a brighter display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite better 1179 x 2556px resolution and a quite better display pixels density.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also has a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and faster video frame rates. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory.
The iPhone 14 Pro has a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 14 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.