Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is way better than the Google Pixel 3a, with a 94.9 score against 78.8. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max body is a lot newer and just a bit thinner than the Google Pixel 3a's, although it is a lot heavier. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x OS, and Google Pixel 3a counts with Android 11 OS.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a better processor than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 14 Pro Max features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a better 1290 x 2796 resolution, a larger screen and a quite greater pixels density.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a back camera with a much higher resolution. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory capacity.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4323mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.