Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 78.8. Apple iPhone X is an older and somewhat heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3a, but Apple made it a bit thinner anyway. IPhone X has a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little bit larger display, a just a bit higher display density and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
IPhone X features a superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The iPhone X features a faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and 2 less cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Apple iPhone X features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a lower video resolution, a lower 12 MP resolution camera and a tinier camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, they both have the same aperture.
Google Pixel 3a features just a bit better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.