Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-05-25 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019)'s 77.8 overall score. The Google Pixel 3a design is notably lighter and thinner than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), although both were released with only 1 months difference. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should count with identical operating system features.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a display that's very similar to the display in Google Pixel 3a, because although the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has faster video frame rates, a much more mega pixels back camera and a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.