Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.19 ounces | -- |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a score of 82.2 against 78.8. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) construction is way thinner and incredibly lighter than Google Pixel 3a. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has the newer 14 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Google Pixel 3a has a better looking display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2220 resolution and a higher pixel density. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Google Pixel 3a has a much better performing processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has better video frame rates and a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.